2498 Chiefswood Road  •  P.O. Box 5000 Ohsweken ON  •  N0A 1M0                           Home     |      Contact Us    |     Privacy
  Litigation
Inadequacy of Crown
Canada's Claim
Policy and Process

  Six Nations of the
Grand River v. Canada
and Ontario

  Amended Statement
of Claim
- March 7, 1995

  Table of
Litigation Process

  Litigation Chronology
Litigation
•   Once a claim is recommended for acceptance as valid, it is sent to the Minister of Indian Affairs for approval. This constitutes direct political interference.
•   Six Nations filed a Statement of Claim on March 7, 1995 against the Crown Canada and Ontario requesting an accounting of all land and monetary transactions held in trust by the Crown.
•   The Claims Policy is applied in an inconsistent and highly arbitrary manner depending far too much on the Senior Bureaucrat or Justice Advisor assigned to the claim.
•   The claims process uses arbitrary standards such as "degree of doubt", "discounting" and "special value to the owner".
•   Four claims have been validated for negotiations, they are Innisfil and East Hawkesbury Townships; Block No. 5, Moulton Township; and Lands Flooded by the Welland Canal.
The Haldimand Treaty of 1784
Whereas His Majesty having been pleased to direct that in consideration of the early attachment to his cause manifested by the Mohawk Indians and of the loss of their settlement which they thereby sustained - that a ...   View More
Return to
Home Page
Litigation - Table of Litigation Process (1995-2005)
SIX NATIONS OF THE GRAND RIVER VS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO COURT FILE #406/95
(Please Click on the Image to View the Full List)

Viewing this document requires the use of an adobe acrobat reader

   Click Here for an Acrobat
Reader
  2008 Six Nations Council. All rights reserved.
Six Nations Lands and Resources is a Department of the Six Nations Council